BlackBerry PlayBook OS 2.0 Review: A Beautiful Desert [Video]
Gizmodo 22 Feb 2012, 9:20 pm CET
This Mini Portable USB Turntable Is Your Preservationist Deal of the Day [Dealzmodo]
Gizmodo 22 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm CET
Beatles Ringtones Come to iTunes (Or You Can Just Make Your Own)
Gadget Lab 22 Feb 2012, 8:43 pm CET
You Can’t Buy Me Love, but that doesn’t mean you can’t buy that track and other songs from John, Paul, George and Ringo as ringtones on iTunes.
Twenty-seven Beatles hits are available as ringtones through iTunes starting today. Each ringtone costs $1.29, and favorites include “Love Me Do,” “Ticket to Ride,” and “Yellow Submarine,” among others.
In a world where the iPhone’s standard Marimba chime seems to be the ringtone de rigueur, you might think that Beatles ringtones would be meaningless to iPhone users. Perhaps. But there’s no denying that ringtones are still a booming business for the music industry, raking in more than $2.1 billion in 2011 alone according to Gartner.
Regardless, if you already own your favorite Beatles song, or heck, the entire discography, then you don’t really need to purchase a separate ringtone. Although you can no longer use iTunes’ super-simple “one-click” method to quickly convert tracks to ringtones for 99 cents (this option has been discontinued), you can still use iTunes to make ringtones — for free.
In iTunes version 10, right-click a song, select Get Info, then Options. Under Options, pick a start and stop time within the track no longer than 30 seconds in length. After hitting OK, right-click and select “Create AAC Version” to make your 30-second track. Now view the track in Finder, and change the file extension to “.m4r”. Delete the other version of the file from iTunes, and then add the .m4r version to iTunes — the song will now be recognized as a ringtone you can use on your iPhone. For a more detailed, step-by-step illustration of how to do this, check out this link.
And if you’re familiar with music editing software like Audacity (a free download), you can use it to similarly edit a track and add it back into iTunes as a ringtone. Again, just make sure the song is no longer than 30 seconds, or iTunes won’t recognize it as a ringtone.
Oh, and in case you were wondering, the Beatles first made the jump to iTunes back in November 2010. Today’s ringtones announcement is a nice little amuse bouche for iPhone users, but if you already own your Beatles tracks, you need not pay $1.29 for the privilege of setting 30-second clips as audio alerts.
Shooting Challenge: Shattered [Shooting Challenge]
Gizmodo 22 Feb 2012, 8:40 pm CET
The Smartphone In Your Pocket Is A Multifunction Buying Machine
Epicenter 22 Feb 2012, 8:25 pm CET
Just like a camera, the best
store is the one you have with you. And most of us carry our
smartphones with us everywhere we go and buy things all day
long.
In a forthcoming consumer study, Nielsen reports that 29 percent of smartphone owners are “mobile shoppers.” This figure is even with a narrowly defined set of “shopping-related activities.” For instance, Nielsen doesn’t include “used a map to find directions to a store or restaurant,” “purchased books, magazines, or applications,” “taking photos of items purchased or desired,” or “sharing reactions to or reviews of a purchase online.” Together, I’d bet that handful of shopping-related activities alone would tip the mobile shoppers figure over 50 percent, at least.
Smartphones aren’t about online commerce so much as digital guidance on the ground. The most popular shopping uses for smartphones are product research, usually in-store. In Q3 2011, 38 percent of mobile shoppers in Nielsen’s survey compared prices online while shopping in a store; 38 percent also browsed products through websites or apps, and 32 percent read online reviews of products.
Mobile shoppers are also making use of more than just the web browser. A full 22 percent are using phones to scan barcodes for prices or product details. Overall, getting information through our phones is much more popular than actually using them to make a purchase.
But this is beginning to change, as a new generation of applications make genuine mobile shopping easier. Twenty-two percent of mobile shoppers actually buy retail products on their phones, through apps or on the web. And although only nine percent have used phones as digital wallets to buy products at point of sale, Nielsen’s researchers note that “the desire to do so is apparent – 71 percent of app downloaders would be interested in an app that allows them to use their phone as a credit card,” with iPhone users leading the way.
Now juxtapose this with another Nielsen study, also released this week, of smartphone penetration by age and income:
The younger you are and the more money you have, the more likely you are to own a smartphone. Young people with disposable income are committed to a mobile, connected lifestyle, comfortable using and downloading apps, clearly comfortable sharing personal information with those apps, and overwhelmingly willing in principle to explore using their phones as digital wallets — yet, they’re not actually doing it. Why not?
Here’s my theory. Even though plenty of companies are working to bring smartphone payments to customers and retailers, none of them have been able to command enough attention from either retailers or users to become a genuine wide-ranging platform. And when it comes to payments, companies really need three things: trust, convenience and ubiquity.
Think about credit cards. It wasn’t so long ago that at least in most contexts, credit cards weren’t very convenient to use. Plenty of retailers still don’t accept them, or illegally insist on minimum purchases, or only support a few major players. (I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen an American Express card rejected by a restaurant whose checks were presented in a leather case with the “American Express” logo emblazoned on the front.)
We commit ourselves to credit cards, smartphones, wireless carriers, social networks and other applications because they’re convenient, they’re broadly useful, and we trust the companies behind them. Once we commit, we’re captured.
There is a huge opportunity for any company who can capture the mobile payments platform for the next generation. I don’t know if that’s Google, Square, Facebook, Amazon, PayPal, Microsoft or some combination of those companies and someone not yet on the scene. But I do know we’re growing more and more accustomed to seeing our smartphones not just as communication and reading devices, but as multipurpose buying machines.
With those huge sums and broad range of uses at stake, mobile commerce’s potential can’t exceed its actualization by this much for so long. Something will break through — and I think it will happen soon.
Magic Bullet Crosses Mexican Border to Hit Woman In Texas [Crime]
Gizmodo 22 Feb 2012, 8:18 pm CET
Rapportive Announces Acquisition By LinkedIn, (Basically) Confirms $15M Price
TechCrunch 22 Feb 2012, 8:04 pm CET
After reports earlier this month that LinkedIn was buying contact management service Rapportive, the startup just published a blog post confirming that yes, it has been acquired.
For those of you who don’t use it, Rapportive is a Gmail plugin that shows you the latest social network updates from whoever you’re corresponding with. (I’ve gotten so used to seeing the Rapportive window next to my emails that I sometimes forget that it’s not a default part of Gmail.) And if you’re a Rapportive user who’s worried that the deal will follow the pattern of so many other startup acquisitions, it sounds like LinkedIn won’t be shutting Rapportive down. CEO Rahul Vohra says:
Over the last two years, Rapportive has become an essential product for folks all around the world. When rumours of our acquisition surfaced last week, many asked what was going to happen to the product. Well, we have fantastic news: at LinkedIn, we will support Rapportive, and we will continue to build beautiful products that make you brilliant with people.
The blog post also includes a section titled “The Future,” though Vohra doesn’t say anything specific about what new things he’ll be working on at LinkedIn. He does say that the Rapportive vision involves building products that “you don’t have to remember to use” (italics his) and that become “an intrinsic part of the tools you use every day.”
After AllThingsD broke the news, TechCrunch’s Alexia Tsotsis dug up the fact that the deal was for $15 million in cash. When I asked Vohra today if he had any comment on Alexia’s story, he said, “Yeah — which of our investors were bragging ?”
Speaking of investors, Rapportive raised $1 million from Charles River Ventures, Paul Buchheit, Scott Banister, Jason Calacanis, Gary Vaynerchuk, Dharmesh Shah, Shervin Pishevar, Roy Rodenstein, Kima Ventures, Zelkova Ventures, 500 Startups, Michael Zirngibl, Ashish Soni and David Cancel.
Squid-Inspired Camera Mount Sucks In the Best Possible Way [Video]
Gizmodo 22 Feb 2012, 8:00 pm CET
Google Fiber just got better? Big G asks for permission to provide video service to Kansas City
Engadget 22 Feb 2012, 7:56 pm CET
Here we thought the citizens of Kansas City couldn't get any more fortunate after being chosen by Google to get a fiber optic gigabit network. Turns out, Google Fiber may be bringing more than just web access, as the company has asked the state of Missouri to allow it to deliver video services as well. We first heard about Big G's possible foray into cable-TV late last year, as the company was in talks with various content providers to see if it could make it happen. Given this official move towards becoming a video provider in America's heartland, we'd say those conversations must have gone fairly well. Either that, or the folks in Kansas City will be watching a whole lot of YouTube's new niche content.
Google Fiber just got better? Big G asks for permission to provide video service to Kansas City originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:56:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink |
Wall
Street Journal | Email
this | Comments
Google Docs for Android update brings collaborative editing for all
Engadget 22 Feb 2012, 7:53 pm CET
It's been barely a month since Google Docs on Android got offline support, but here comes Mountain View with another equally impressive update. Those upgrading today are treated to collaborative editing, much in the vein of their desktop counterparts. That means you can now watch edits happen in real time from your Android tablet or smartphone. In addition, there's a bevy of interface tweaks too, including a new pinch-to-zoom gesture and rich text formatting. Feel good video demoing all awaits after the break.
Continue reading Google Docs for Android update brings collaborative editing for all
Google Docs for Android update brings collaborative editing for all originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:53:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink |
The
Official Google Blog,
Google Docs (Android Market)
| Email
this | Comments
Keen On… Gracenote: How To Make Data Pay In The Music Business (TCTV)
TechCrunch 22 Feb 2012, 7:51 pm CET
While the early history of the Internet is littered with the corpses of music start-ups, not all digital music companies have failed. Take, for example, Gracenote. Founded in 1998, the Berkeley based company was sold to Sony in 2008 for $260 million and is one of the real pioneers of the evolving digital economy. Gracenote has built its business out of maintaining and licensing a massive (currently 100 million tracks) database of information about music. And today, Gracenote – with its 350 employees in Europe, the US and Asia – is expanding into licensing digital data for video and television content.
Last week, at SFMusicTech, I sat down with Ty Roberts, Gracenote’s co-founder and current CTO, to learn more about his company’s past and future. The experienced data mogul was particularly wise on our uses and abuses of data, warning that a failure to respect user’s data (Path, Facebook, Google, Twitter et al) is not only immoral but also bad business practice. And Roberts also offered some sagacious advice to music executives, arguing that traditional, file based information no longer has much value and that there was a need to radically change the way in which music is both packaged and sold to consumers.
My conversation with Roberts is part of an extended series of interviews about the current state of the online music industry that I conducted last week at SFMusicTech. Other interviews include the Grateful Dead’s Bob Weir, BitTorrent inventor Bram Cohen and Stageit CEO Evan Lowenstein.
Is Google Trying to Kill Web Video? [Lawsuits]
Gizmodo 22 Feb 2012, 7:46 pm CET
Sony Mobile rebranding quietly begins, changes to roll out over the next month
Engadget 22 Feb 2012, 7:39 pm CET
With the assimilation of Ericsson's wireless stake now neatly a footnote in its corporate history, Sony's moving on and making its newfound freedom known -- albeit quietly. According to a rep for the company, its first rebranding baby steps began just last night, with the former SonyEricsson portal now redirecting to SonyMobile.com. Other related properties, like its social networking extensions and various related digital properties, are also slated to make the transition throughout March, with further announcements planned for Mobile World Congress next week. We'll be there live in just a few days, so stay tuned. In the meanwhile, hit up the source below to see synergy at its finest. [Thanks, Kevin]
Sony Mobile rebranding quietly begins, changes to roll out over the next month originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:39:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink |
Sony
Mobile | Email
this | Comments
Exoskeleton Legs Promise Superhero Strength
Gadget Lab 22 Feb 2012, 7:37 pm CET
Filmmaker and exoskeleton enthusiast James Cameron must be beside himself right now. RB3D’s Hercule exoskeleton legs will soon be available to help humans lift heavy items — and possibly fight off angry aliens in the event of a xenomorph invasion.
The legs are a joint venture between French company RB3D, the French Directorate General Armaments, CES LIST, and ESME Sudria. The battery-powered legs are designed to help their human controllers lift up to 220 pounds, and will reportedly remain powered for 12.5 miles if the user walks at a normal place. That’s more than enough battery juice to extract your mini-fridge from the garage, and drop it on the curb.
Because the legs move in unison with the wearer, according to an engineer, users can quickly adapt to the use of the Hercule. RB3D plans to have make the exoskeleton legs available for civilian and military use in 2014.
Wired Opinion: The Geek Shall Lin-herit The Earth (Or At Least The NBA)
Epicenter 22 Feb 2012, 7:23 pm CET
Last week, I spoke on a panel organized by GrubWithUs for Social Media Week New York. Such events attract a wide range of people interested in the tech industry, either because they’re in it or aspire to be. The topic may’ve been food startups, but when I introduced myself as “Jeremy Lin’s biggest fan,” the room was cheering (by contrast, “co-founder of reddit” drew a few polite nods and tennis claps). I thought this was supposed to be a tech event.

It was no longer just Knicks fans, or even just basketball fans; that was when I realized New York City had gone completely Lin-sane (OK, that’s the last one).
There have already been several attempts to explain Lin’s (seemingly) sudden explosion on the court and in our national (nay, global) consciousness. Timothy Yu offered a great explanation from the Asian American community when he said, “he’s everything we are, and he’s everything we’ve been told we can never be.” Sure, being a Harvard graduate makes for a good sound byte, but an Ivy League pedigree alone does not a sports phenomenon make (see: Harvard graduate and Buffalo Bills quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick, whom commentators seem to know nothing about save his alma mater).
Sure, performing well in the country’s media capital on an until-recently-disappointing team gooses one’s popularity. And of course, an easily pun-able surname helps spread the word — take note, parents (branding 101 from the guy who launched companies named “reddit”, “breadpig”, and “hipmunk”). But none of these explain why I — and many of my fellow geeks — love him so damn much.
Jeremy Lin is a validation of our worldview: Ignore expectation, follow the data.
Lin didn’t come out of nowhere. The data was there all along. After shocking the Lakers, even Kobe Bryant recognized, “players don’t usually come out of nowhere. If you go back and take a look, his skill level was probably there but no one ever noticed.”
While the high-paid analysts at ESPN were scratching their heads and asking, “why didn’t we see Jeremy Lin coming?”, a FedEx Ground delivery truck driver, Ed Weiland, wasn’t surprised:
“Jeremy Lin might be the #2 PG available in this draft. […] Jeremy Lin is a good enough player to start in the NBA and possibly star.”
Weiland’s emphatic analysis appeared in 2010, the year Lin went undrafted. This nearly two-year-old entry circulated online thanks to a user who submitted it to Hacker News, a reddit-like site with a community of startup founders and the startup-curious. Needless to say, Lin gained quite a few fans who hadn’t watched a lot of basketball.
Geeks strive to build a world where decisions are driven by data. At this point in time, the internet is the closest thing we have to a marketplace of free ideas. If you’ve got the talent and access to the data, you have a fair shot at making something great (keeping that data free was a major driving force behind our opposition to SOPA & PIPA). Moneyball inspired millions, but it especially warmed the hearts of geeks, even those of us that got picked last during gym class. These are not new insights. In 2009, Michael Lewis wrote an article in the New York Times about Houston Rockets GM Daryl Morey using secret statistics “to find new and better ways to value players and strategies.”
There’s still more moneyballing to be done in the NBA, methinks.
There’ll inevitably be some, like Weiland, who end up looking prescient (notwithstanding the predictions he made that didn’t pan out). The point is, geeks with “spiral notebooks full of numbers” have their place at the table for talent decisions. At least start with a spreadsheet to remind folks about the myth of the “hot hand.” A data-driven approach could’ve identified a great talent from the bottom of the depthchart — instead we (Knicks fans) got lucky.
Imagine all the Jeremy Lins we’ve already missed out on. This isn’t just a plea to combat prejudice; it’s a call for rational decision-making.
Actually, it’s also sort of a plea: New York Knickerbockers, please hire some number crunchers so I can finally erase the memory of Hakeem Olajuwon.
Alexis Ohanian’s social enterprise, breadpig, is partnering with ticket search engine, SeatGeek, to giveaway a pair of tickets to the Knicks vs. Cavaliers game at MSG on Feb. 29. Enter here by making a donation to a DonorsChoose.org classroom in New York and let’s cheer on Lin (and the power of data) together!
Your Sweaty Ass Could Soon Be Charging Your Phone [Science]
Gizmodo 22 Feb 2012, 7:20 pm CET
Mozilla Labs Apps set to allow developer submissions for Mozilla Marketplace at MWC
Engadget 22 Feb 2012, 7:19 pm CET

Continue reading Mozilla Labs Apps set to allow developer submissions for Mozilla Marketplace at MWC
Mozilla Labs Apps set to allow developer submissions for Mozilla Marketplace at MWC originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:19:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink
Mobile
Burn |
The
Mozilla Blog | Email
this | Comments
The Foxconn Reality: "Better" Is Still Bad [Foxconn]
Gizmodo 22 Feb 2012, 7:17 pm CET
Google’s Diversifying Display Ad Business Could Pass Facebook’s, eMarketer Guesses
TechCrunch 22 Feb 2012, 7:00 pm CET
Research firm eMarketer has puts together a few interesting data points that show Google doing better in display ads than you might have realized. That is, by growing this business across properties and networks that it at some point acquired — YouTube, DoubleClick, and mobile (AdMob) — it’s set to pass Facebook’s own display business.
The social network had the highest online ad sales of any company in the US last year, at $1.73 billion dollars. But that was a mere $200 million or so above Google. This year, eMarketer expects a similar story, with Facebook bringing in $2.58 billion versus Google’s $2.54 billion. Things change in 2013 and 2014, further off from what the data can tell us accurately.
The firm thinks Facebook’s growth rate is going to plummet after this year, down to 13% in 2014, while Google’s is going to continue at nearly 50% through 2013 and still at nearly 30% in 2014.
I’m not ready to bet on that.
The estimates are based on publicly available documents from both companies, and other sources. On Google’s side, its earnings from last quarter indicated that its non-search ads were on track to reach $5 billion a year, or 12% of its total business. This is double what it brought in over the previous five quarters. YouTube is getting better and better at monetizing videos, DoubleClick is a market leader in online display ads, and AdMob has a strong position across mobile platforms. I agree it makes sense to be bullish about this part of Google’s business.
On Facebook’s side, eMarketer’s original estimate for its revenue had been $2.01 billion in the US, but Facebook’s S-1 filing proved this to be around 15% over what it actually was. The projections here read as if eMarketer feels burned by being so positive about last year. But the report manages to qualify itself in the event that Facebook revenue does in fact start to grow more quickly, by noting the potential benefits of newer advertising features like Sponsored Stories.
That’s the thing. Facebook’s ad business is still young, the company is fine-tuning all sorts of interesting features, and there are other ways that the business could see new growth, for example if Facebook launches a web-wide ad network that competes with DoubleClick and the rest of the online ad industry. 2013 and 2014 are a long ways off, and other numbers like traffic are looking fine.
Ridiculous: A Loose Cable Caused Those 'Faster-Than-Light' Particles [Physics]
Gizmodo 1 Jan 1970, 1:00 am CET
| More |














